 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Market autocracy
In the countries, whose structure has been the result of a long history of democracy development the market economy has been developed. It's is able to meet better the raising modern needs of a human society. However the market-forming technologies development made people falling into the autocracy of other type – the autocracy of marketing forming technologies.
It happens just due to the market ideology. After all the market is aimed to the most mass consumers, thus the higher the product consumer’s quantity is – the better. That makes the commercial revenues higher. The mass consumers are never characterized with some outstanding properties – that is the reason these properties are called "outstanding". Hence the market is aimed to the "maximum" of the average distribution curve.
There is the statistical law, which shows that if the eliminating selection factors are absent, the maximum of that curve shifts toward the more frequent feature. That is why the market, which aims to the mass consumer needs meeting, and which simultaneously secures the surviving of the less intellectually developed individuals, causes the decrease of the general intellectual development of a society. It proves by the Flynn's Effect that shows that in the developed countries the “general IQ” level was significantly rising up to approximately 70 s, but tuned backward later. At the same time the individualization level, this is regarded here as just some kind of asocial behaviour on the contrary increases. It looks so unusual, exciting and interesting to the young people who never knew other living conditions! In combination with the Flynn's Effect and marketing laws of it led to of a mass postmodernism arising and its flourishing in the pop cultures. (in its mass pop-forms; talents and unique persons may occur always and everywhere, however; they go across the public opinion – whatever it is, and hence can be hardly estimated by contemporaries; these persons are mainly those very non-conformists those go across the market ideology; the problem is that the modern, present “non-conformists” got the integral part of market ideology as well land thus they gave up being non-conformists. )
So it's some kind of autocracy too, just it's more flexible and hence more vital. Any alternatives are to be rigid and hence doomed.