 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
About gender
Now let’s discuss the sexes interrelations.
Currently the general paradigm changing is proved by new common public legends occurring. There is a movie the "Best friend's wedding" - a typically Hollywood movie with Julia Roberts ( though alone she is, without forever Lancelot Richard Gear;-). It’d be strange to expect more than another «Cinderella» variation. The movie beginning looks rather traditional.
But the subject flowing head was completely unexpected. Well, the according to the genre laws a possible bride should get married by the end, shouldn’t she? More so because the heroine was a woman that had suddenly realized that she was in love with her best friend exactly at his marriage moment (he was to marry another woman).
After she had realized it she did all her best to prevent this marriage. The problem was that she liked the «alternative bride» too, she found it quite a nice girl.
All movie long she was trying to ruin this marriage. Another friend of her, a homosexual guy ( like diamonds they seem to be "girl's best friends" :-), so that guy was helping her. They had almost succeeded.
But by the end this ruinning failed. Highly unexpected that was, all film long she was expecting to win according to the genre laws.
But that was a heroine ruinning by no means. The
very last words belonging to that homosexual guy were: "And now they(he meant an aside look)would waltz together. They look exciting. No matter they would not get married and for sure they would not having sex, no matter the man is late to the train, but - but they look so nice together".... I don't remember exactly, literally, but that was something like that. Isn't it A GREAT MYTH destruction?
I mean that for a long time a woman was always a depending part.
That's way no friendship between a man and a woman was possible - only equal ones could be friends. After the "sexual revolution" of 60-es due to the women deliberation of the Eve's curse ( i.e. methods of preventing and stopping pregnancy development) the roles exchanged but the situation was still unequal, though it tends being in vice versa nowadays - a week male with a strong female. The scandal American series the "Sex and the city" proves it. Well, but it's nothing but overpopulation results. And I believe it to be the results of action-contraction effect as it usually comes up.
In the meanwhile the golden middle is highly desirable and it is badly expected. Though the sex roles are still the same.... And they were determined by the very
evolution process.
In the meanwhile since the evolutionary mainstream is indeed mind-control over instincts, a friendship might be better, might it not? But it had already been set above that no male-female friendship is possible- that is true but only in case if there is a sexual tension. Well, to win it there are two ways.
One should get that sexual interrelarions are close to food supply. After all, both gluttony and dystrophy are disgusting. Nobody would like being either podge or dystrophic. But there are too much psychological problems related, for example the jealousy... And it's related with status question too. But if you are sure that the mind is yours - then what is the use of it?
But these effects contradict with
so ancient traditional behavioral patters! That would be hard to overcome them.
